HOSPITALS TRY FREE BASIC CARE FOR THE UNINSURED

URGENT ADVOCATE ALERT: Trends in Risk Reduction Practices for the Prevention of Lymphedema * *
advocacy news, Medicare coverage of Lymphedema Garments, Bandages and Supplies, ssdi, new york lymphedema bill, medicare drug plan, medicare therapy caps, Access to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Services Act, medicare Outpatient Therapy Caps Exception Process 2007, Lymphedema Stakeholders, Prosthetics, Orthotics, long term disability, Georgia Medical, Nursing and Therapy Schools, Georgia lymphedema resolution, lymphatic disease awareness, insurance companies, resource links, Status of state bills for lymphedema treatment, Lymphedema Awareness Day - Georgia, Consumer Actions Websites, Health Policy Issues, How to lobby, National institutes health, Patient advocacy, Federal government, state government resources

Moderators: jenjay, Cassie, patoco, Birdwatcher, Senior Moderators

HOSPITALS TRY FREE BASIC CARE FOR THE UNINSURED

Postby silkie » Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:41 am

Although not mentioned explicitly, there is an important lesson in the
article below relating to the treatment of lymphedema to prevent recurrent
infections. Send a copy to your State and Congressional representatives with a mention
of the need for lymphedema diagnosis and treatment legislation.

Bob Weiss
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= =====

The New York Times
October 25, 2006

Hospitals Try Free Basic Care for Uninsured
By ERIK ECKHOLM
Correction Appended
AUSTIN, Tex. - Unable to afford health insurance, Dee Dee Dodd had for years
been mixing occasional doctor visits with clumsy efforts to self-manage her
insulin-dependent diabetes, getting sicker all the while.
In one 18-month period, Ms. Dodd, 38, was rushed almost monthly to the
emergency room, spent weeks in the intensive care unit and accumulated more than
$191,000 in unpaid bills.
That is when nurses at the Seton Family of Hospitals tagged her as a “
frequent flier,” a repeat visitor whose ailments - and expenses - might be curbed
with more regular care. The hospital began offering her free primary care through
its charity program.
With the number of uninsured people in the United States reaching a record
46.6 million last year, up by 7 million from 2000, Seton is one of a small
number of hospital systems around the country to have done the math and acted on
it. Officials decided that for many patients with chronic diseases, it would be c
heaper to provide free preventive care than to absorb the high cost of
repeated emergencies.
With patients like Ms. Dodd, “they can have better care and we can reduce the
costs for the hospital,” said Dr. Melissa Smith, medical director of three
community health centers run by Seton, a Roman Catholic hospital network that
uses its profits and donations to provide nearly free care to 5,000 of the
working poor. Over the last 18 months, Ms. Dodd's health has improved, and her
medical bills have been cut nearly in half.
Reaching out to uninsured patients, especially those with chronic conditions
like diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure or asthma, is a recent
tactic of “a handful of visionary hospital systems around the country,” said
Karen Davis, president of the Commonwealth Fund, a foundation in New York that
concentrates on health care. These institutions are searching for ways to fend
off disease and large debts by bringing uninsured visitors into continuing
basic care.
The public hospital systems in New York and Denver, for example, have both
worked to steer uninsured patients to community clinics, charging modest fees,
if any. New York's public system, the Health and Hospitals Corporation, has
assigned some 240,000 uninsured patients to personal primary care doctors. A
computerized system tracks those with chronic conditions, and when necessary,
social workers contact patients to make sure they get checkups and follow medical
advice.
“For most preventive efforts there is an upfront expense,” said Alan D.
Aviles, president of the corporation. “But over the long term it saves money.”
Denver's public system, Denver Health, has 41,000 uninsured patients enrolled
in its clinics. Officials there calculate that for every dollar they spend on
prenatal care for uninsured women, they save more than $7 in newborn and
child care.
The “safety net” plan of the Seton system in Central Texas accepts people
making 150 percent to 250 percent of the federal poverty limit and has resources
to support 5,000 patients. (People below the poverty line, which is $13,200 a
year for a family of two in the contiguous states, can obtain care through
the public clinic system.)
Officials scrutinize the records of plan members to see who is still
overusing the emergency room or being repeatedly hospitalized - these high-cost
patients total some 40 each month - then assign them caseworkers to help improve
care and bring down costs.
A special effort to educate 631 asthma patients saved the plan $475,000 in
one year, Seton officials said.
In a more unusual step, Seton officials also look for frequent emergency room
users who do not qualify for the hospital's charity plan because they live in
a different county, like Ms. Dodd, or have incomes just above the threshold.
In a dozen cases so far, all involving diabetics, a committee has judged that
it makes financial sense to bring these people into the charity plan anyway
and provide intensive support.
Other answers to the insurance crisis are being tried around the country,
including the creation of subsidized, bare-bones policies for small businesses.
Vermont, Maine and especially Massachusetts are using combinations of state and
federal money and employer mandates to extend insurance.
Still, only a fraction of the uninsured, in Central Texas and in most other
states, are benefiting.
“All these local efforts are commendable, but they are like sticking fingers
in the dikes,” Ms. Davis of the Commonwealth Fund said, noting that the larger
trend was hospitals' seeking to avoid the uninsured.
Nowhere is the problem more acute than in Texas, where nearly a quarter of
the population is uninsured, the nation's highest rate. Small businesses here
are unlikely to offer benefits, and the state government's unusually stringent
restrictions on Medicaid for adults leave many of the working poor at risk.
Even without counting the large immigrant population, Texas has the country's
highest share of uninsured, at 21 percent, according to the Center for Public
Policy Priorities in Austin.
“All the hospitals here provide some uncompensated care, and they are eating
it and passing the costs along to the payers,” said Patricia A. Young Brown,
president of the Travis County Healthcare District, which was set up last year
to oversee care of the indigent through public clinics, drawing on property
taxes to pay.
“So insurance rates go up, and then more businesses drop insurance,” Ms.
Young Brown continued, describing a trend unfolding nationwide. “It's hard to see
where it will end. We hear a cry for national and state leadership.”
The private People's Community Clinic, supported in part by the St. David's
Hospital system, gives primary care to 11,000 people in Austin who are
uninsured or on Medicaid and related programs.
“I think we are a good Band-Aid for those able to come to our clinic,”
Regina Rogoff, director of the clinic, said. “But it's not a solution to have such
a ragtag, makeshift system.”
Austin hospitals and charity clinics have also joined in a pioneering
data-sharing system to track visits by uninsured patients and fight unnecessary use
of the emergency room. But rural counties in Texas offer little aid, and rural
residents with serious maladies end up traveling to urban emergency rooms.
The current patchwork also pits different levels of government against each
other.
Natavidad Martinez, 51, who used to work as a bookbinder for $7 an hour and
never had insurance, has found herself in a bureaucratic nightmare.
In March 2005, Ms. Martinez, a Seton patient, was found to have liver cancer.
She was put on Medicaid, applied for federal disability and was put in line
for a liver transplant, without which, doctors said, she had six months to two
years to live. Through the summer of 2005, she made the hour-and-a-half drive
from her home to San Antonio for preparatory tests.
That August, she was awarded disability payments of $561 a month. But because
her income surpassed the $535 limit for Medicaid in her circumstances, she
said, she was told by the state that her coverage had ended, and the hospital
said it could not proceed with a transplant.
“I asked Social Security if they couldn't just reduce my payments by $30 a
month,” she said, “but they said it doesn't work that way.”
In another twist, by federal rules, she will qualify for Medicare two years
after the initial finding of disability. She awaits the start of Medicare
coverage next March, when she can rejoin the transplant line.
In Texas, as throughout the country, the coverage of poor children through
Medicaid and related programs expanded greatly over the last decade. But a
majority of states do not provide Medicaid to parents making even poverty-line
incomes, and Texas is one of the least generous: here, a working parent of two
does not qualify for coverage if he or she makes more than $3,696 in a year,
leaving people like Ms. Dodd to fend for themselves.
Ms. Dodd, who worked as a dental assistant, is married to a truck driver, has
four children and lives on a country road in Hays County, south of Austin.
Ten years ago, after her weight fell to 82 pounds, she learned that she was a “
brittle diabetic,” subject to rapid and dangerous changes in blood sugar. She
saw a doctor only sporadically because visits cost $120 - money she did not
have.
“I had to stop working, so then I couldn't afford to go to the doctor, and
then I had to go to the emergency room,” Ms. Dodd said.
She was having repeated episodes of ketoacidosis, a chemical imbalance that
sometimes put her into life-threatening comas. Years of poor care had weakened
her and led to side effects like esophogeal ulcers that could probably have
been prevented, her doctors said.
Ms. Dodd still has problems, but the use of a $3,200 insulin pump paid for by
Seton, which automatically adjusts her insulin levels, along with access to
an endocrinologist and home counseling have reduced their severity. Her care in
the last 18 months has cost Seton $104,697, far below the $191,277 for the
previous period. More important, the later figures include less hospital time
and more medicines and expert advice.
“The money we save,” Dr. Smith, of Seton, said, “money that is not
hemorrhaging through the I.C.U., is money we can do so much more with to help her
upfront.”

Correction: Oct. 26, 2006
A front-page article yesterday about hospitals that offer free basic care to
the uninsured referred incorrectly to the 47 million uninsured people in the
United States. The figure includes noncitizens; they are not all Americans.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Thanks Bob (posted in our advocacy Forum)
User avatar
silkie
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: England

Return to Advocacy and Governmental Resources

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest